"He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how". - Nietzsche
From the book, Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl.
Man has both potentialities within himself; which one is actualized depends on decisions but not on conditions.
An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior.
Love is the ultimate and the highest goal to which man can aspire. The salvation of man is through love and in love.
Love goes very far beyond the physical person of the beloved. It finds its deepest meaning in his spiritual being, his innner self. Whether or not he is actually persent, whether or not he is still alive at all, ceases somehow to be of importance.
Humor was another of the soul's weapons in the fight for self-preservation. It is well known that humor, more than anything else in the human make-up, can afford an aloffness and an ability to rise above any situation, even if only for a few seconds.
Even though conditions such as lack of sleep, insufficient food and various mental stresses may suggest that the inmates (of concentration camp) were bound to react in certain ways, in the final analysis it becomes clear that the sort of person the prisoner became was the result of an inner decision, and not the result of camp influences alone. Fundamentally, therefore, any man can, even under such circumstances, decide what shall become of him-mentally and spiritually.
The way in which a man accepts his fate and all the suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his cross, gives him ample opportunity-even under the most difficult circumstances-to add a deeper meaning to his life.
Often it is just an exceptionally difficult external situation which gives man the opportunity to grow spirtually beyond himself.
Life is like being at the dentist. You always think that the worst is still to come, and yet it is over already.
It is peculiarity of man that he can only live by looking to the future -- sub specie aeternitatis.
Emotion, which is suffering, ceases to be suffering as soon as we form a clear and precise picture of it.
"Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich starker". (That which does not kill me, makes me stronger.) - Nietzsche.
"He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how". - Nietzsche
LOGOTHERAPY
Logotherapy focuses on the future, that is to say, on the assignments and meanings to be fulfilled by the patient in his future. At the same time, logotherapy de-focuses all the vicious circle formations and feedback mechanisms which play such a great role in the development of neuroses.
Logotherapy focuses on the meaning of human existence as well as on man's search for such a meaning. According to logotherapy, this striving to find a meaning in one's life is the primary motivational force in man.
The will to meaning is unique and specific in that it must and can be fulfilled by him alone; only then does it achieve a significance which will satisfy his own will to meaning.
Values, however, do not drive a man; they do not push him, but rather pull him.
Mental health is based on a certain degree of tension, the tension between what one has already achieved and what one still ought to accomplish, or the gap between what one is and what one should become. Such a tension is inherent in the human being and therefore is indispensable to mental well-being.
The meaning of life differs from man to man, from day to day and from hour to hour. What matters, therefore, is not the meaning of life in general but rather the specific meaning of a person's life at a given moment.
One should not search for an abstract meaning of life. Everyone has his own specific vocation or mission in life to carry out a concrete assignment whihc demands fulfillment. Therein he cannot be replaced, nor can his life be repeated. Thus, everyone's task is as unique as is his specific opportunity to implement it.
Man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather he must recognise that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life; to life he can only respond by being responsible.
The essence of existence: Live as if you were living already for the second time and as if you had acted the first time as wrongly as you are about to act now! It seems to me that there is nothing which would stimulate a man's sense of responsibleness more than this maxim, which invites him to imagine first that the present is past and, second, that the past may yet be changed and amended. Such a precept confronts him with life's finiteness as well as the finality of what he makes out of both his life and himself.
A human being is not one thing among others; things determine each other, but man is ultimately self-determining. What he becomes-within the limits of endowment and environment-he has made out of himself. After all, man is that being who has invented the gas chambers of Auschwitz; however, he is also that being who has entered those gas chambers upright, with the Lord's Prayer of the Shema Yisrael on his lips.
Man has both potentialities within himself; which one is actualized depends on decisions but not on conditions.
An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior.
Love is the ultimate and the highest goal to which man can aspire. The salvation of man is through love and in love.
Love goes very far beyond the physical person of the beloved. It finds its deepest meaning in his spiritual being, his innner self. Whether or not he is actually persent, whether or not he is still alive at all, ceases somehow to be of importance.
Humor was another of the soul's weapons in the fight for self-preservation. It is well known that humor, more than anything else in the human make-up, can afford an aloffness and an ability to rise above any situation, even if only for a few seconds.
Even though conditions such as lack of sleep, insufficient food and various mental stresses may suggest that the inmates (of concentration camp) were bound to react in certain ways, in the final analysis it becomes clear that the sort of person the prisoner became was the result of an inner decision, and not the result of camp influences alone. Fundamentally, therefore, any man can, even under such circumstances, decide what shall become of him-mentally and spiritually.
The way in which a man accepts his fate and all the suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his cross, gives him ample opportunity-even under the most difficult circumstances-to add a deeper meaning to his life.
Often it is just an exceptionally difficult external situation which gives man the opportunity to grow spirtually beyond himself.
Life is like being at the dentist. You always think that the worst is still to come, and yet it is over already.
It is peculiarity of man that he can only live by looking to the future -- sub specie aeternitatis.
Emotion, which is suffering, ceases to be suffering as soon as we form a clear and precise picture of it.
"Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich starker". (That which does not kill me, makes me stronger.) - Nietzsche.
"He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how". - Nietzsche
LOGOTHERAPY
Logotherapy focuses on the future, that is to say, on the assignments and meanings to be fulfilled by the patient in his future. At the same time, logotherapy de-focuses all the vicious circle formations and feedback mechanisms which play such a great role in the development of neuroses.
Logotherapy focuses on the meaning of human existence as well as on man's search for such a meaning. According to logotherapy, this striving to find a meaning in one's life is the primary motivational force in man.
The will to meaning is unique and specific in that it must and can be fulfilled by him alone; only then does it achieve a significance which will satisfy his own will to meaning.
Values, however, do not drive a man; they do not push him, but rather pull him.
Mental health is based on a certain degree of tension, the tension between what one has already achieved and what one still ought to accomplish, or the gap between what one is and what one should become. Such a tension is inherent in the human being and therefore is indispensable to mental well-being.
The meaning of life differs from man to man, from day to day and from hour to hour. What matters, therefore, is not the meaning of life in general but rather the specific meaning of a person's life at a given moment.
One should not search for an abstract meaning of life. Everyone has his own specific vocation or mission in life to carry out a concrete assignment whihc demands fulfillment. Therein he cannot be replaced, nor can his life be repeated. Thus, everyone's task is as unique as is his specific opportunity to implement it.
Man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather he must recognise that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life; to life he can only respond by being responsible.
The essence of existence: Live as if you were living already for the second time and as if you had acted the first time as wrongly as you are about to act now! It seems to me that there is nothing which would stimulate a man's sense of responsibleness more than this maxim, which invites him to imagine first that the present is past and, second, that the past may yet be changed and amended. Such a precept confronts him with life's finiteness as well as the finality of what he makes out of both his life and himself.
A human being is not one thing among others; things determine each other, but man is ultimately self-determining. What he becomes-within the limits of endowment and environment-he has made out of himself. After all, man is that being who has invented the gas chambers of Auschwitz; however, he is also that being who has entered those gas chambers upright, with the Lord's Prayer of the Shema Yisrael on his lips.

2 Comments:
@Nitin : The quest from the meanings of our own life is essentially what every religion and spiritual idea boils down to. Be it pursued through Stephan Covey, Paulo Coehlo or Ved Vyas (i.e. Bhagwad Gita, which again is THE masterpiece on this topic).
As for "Fountainhead", I think I don't undersstand the point you are trying to make. "...we do not try and relate works of fiction...". If here u mean to say that the book should be treated as a work of fiction only, my previous mail was saying the same thing. "...When a commendable work of fiction, based on someone's life's philosophy, is regarded as outlandish, it doesn't do justice to it....". I has said that the work is a brilliant piece of fiction. Unfortunately (depends on which side u are), the philosophy of Objectivism as potrayed by Ayn Rand, I would still maintain, is outlandish. Even in US, there has been a period when Ayn Rand started gaining lot of fan following and it bacme something like a neo-cult movement. I don't prescribe to that philosophy. As a matter of fact, when I first read the book, I got truck-loads of adrenalin shots and goose-bumps. Doing the best and pushing the limits should always be practiced; it brings out astoninshing results. But crticsing mediocrism and denouncng it to the extent that it has no place in the world is in unhealthy.
As an aside, Atlas Shrugged makes a better fiction and has more suspense + corporate drama. However, I do believe that one has to be really determined or be Ayn Rand's fan to pick-up and finish the book; which, in either case, means that you are already following her philosophy. :)
--Ankit
On 5/12/05, Nitin Pulyani wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Today when I opened my mailbox, I saw this mail in my mailbox with the "common" subject "Man's search for meaning". It did not intrigued me much as my thinking goes with Mukesh that nowadays this has become a phrase to sell. Love, I think you haven't properly captured Mukesh's meaning. Love, your thougts are very correct and very pure, that everyone should thnk over the happenings of life and try to find answers to them. It's not spiritual, but it's really an eye openenr excercise. If one tries to find answers to the "why's" of his life's events, his life would be much easier. Mukesh was just trying to say that nowadays there are so many books with this theme that it's hard to find one good person who really gives a message. I haven't yet read "Man's search for Meaning" but I guess, after going through your blog that it must be good. Will read it sometime.
And yes, "Fountainhead" is one book which really changed my outlook towards life. Well, it's a matter of personal choice, but if we do not try and relate works of fiction (rather, other's thoughts put down as fiction) with our own life, it would be better. When a commendable work of fiction, based on someone's life's philosophy, is regarded as outlandish, it doesn't do justice to it. Right? I agree with Mukesh in referring to the book as "Masterpiece".
Anyways, guys, this is a very healthy discussion going on. Thanks Love for initiating it.
PS: Guys, The above mentioned thoughts are purely my personal thoughts. I apologize for unintentionally hurting anyone's feelings.
Regards,
Nitin
On 5/11/05, Love Kothari wrote:
Hey Guys,
Good to see some nice discussion going on.
I have read Fountainhead (thanks to Muks' reco and I really liked it). But I would agree with Ankit that its a little outlandish though it conveys a great message.
I have got a copy of 'The Road Less Travelled' and will read it over the next few weeks. (thanks to Ankit for a nice suggestion).
Regarding "Man's Search for Meaning", I guess, my blog is not doing the justice to the book. You have to read the book to appreciate the message its trying to convey. It is also a very old book, based on the concentration camps in 2nd world war. I disapprove of Muks' idea of these statements being bland or commonplace. Hey, com'on. this is something which everyone should try to realise and the sooner one does it, the better it is.
I guess everybody believes and tries to sit back and analyse at some point of time or other that why the
things are going the way they are. What is he really doing and why? What is the ultimate goal.
Anyways, we should debate more on this...:) Lets see what others have to say on this.
- Love.
--- Ankit Jain wrote:
> @Muks : Fountainhead is a great work of fiction. And it should just be treated as that..."Fiction". The philosophy it tries to promulgate, IMHO, is a delusion and has hypnotic affect. Once you snap back, it seems so outlandish and unjustifiable.
As for "meaning in life", I rate very highly the book "The Road Less
Travelled" by M. Scott Peck. Again. its a matter of personal taste.
--Ankit
On 5/11/05, mukesh wrote:
>
> >
> > Read your blog. Its good but these statements for
> "meaning in life",
> > "search for self" have become very commonplace...
> almost bland.
> >
> > It requires a great ingenuity on the part of the writer to interest people in these things and make the person think.. (for sometime bcoz eventually he
> > will go back and start indulging again!!)
> > A masterpiece in this topic is "FountainHead" by Ayn Rand. One must read it.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home